Options
Performances of some low-cost counter electrode materials in CdS and CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells
Journal
Nanoscale Research Letters
ISSN
1556-276X
Date Issued
2014-02-10
Author(s)
Mohamed Abdul Careem
Abdul Kariem Arof
DOI
https://nanoscalereslett.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/1556-276X-9-69
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Different counter electrode (CE) materials based on carbon and Cu<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>S were prepared for the application in CdS and CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs). The CEs were prepared using low-cost and facile methods. Platinum was used as the reference CE material to compare the performances of the other materials. While carbon-based materials produced the best solar cell performance in CdS QDSSCs, platinum and Cu<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>S were superior in CdSe QDSSCs. Different CE materials have different performance in the two types of QDSSCs employed due to the different type of sensitizers and composition of polysulfide electrolytes used. The poor performance of QDSSCs with some CE materials is largely due to the lower photocurrent density and open-circuit voltage. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy performed on the cells showed that the poor-performing QDSSCs had higher charge-transfer resistances and CPE values at their CE/electrolyte interfaces.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Different counter electrode (CE) materials based on carbon and Cu<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>S were prepared for the application in CdS and CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs). The CEs were prepared using low-cost and facile methods. Platinum was used as the reference CE material to compare the performances of the other materials. While carbon-based materials produced the best solar cell performance in CdS QDSSCs, platinum and Cu<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>S were superior in CdSe QDSSCs. Different CE materials have different performance in the two types of QDSSCs employed due to the different type of sensitizers and composition of polysulfide electrolytes used. The poor performance of QDSSCs with some CE materials is largely due to the lower photocurrent density and open-circuit voltage. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy performed on the cells showed that the poor-performing QDSSCs had higher charge-transfer resistances and CPE values at their CE/electrolyte interfaces.</jats:p>
File(s)
Loading...
Name
Picture1.png
Type
personal picture
Size
3.11 KB
Format
PNG
Checksum
(MD5):21881560e0c3c9c06b18c6e8fdc11acf
